[This blog post is a continuation from my National Cinema — German Expressionism post]
I’ve been making films for about two years now, so I should know what influences are shown through my work…right? Eeeeh, maybe not. Especially as of late, my work has been specifically client driven, and when I put my own spin on it, it’s either against the brief or is not to the clients liking.
Afflictions and Grumble Love are my two productions i’ve made where I felt I had more creative freedom. Even though Afflictions wasn’t as successful as i’d hoped, I still feel German Expressionism still slightly fed it’s way through, however not visually. My main character was severely corrupted, as she was seeing and hearing people who weren’t there and thought they were real people who were antagonising her. Corrupt characters are often found in expressionist films [as discussed in my previous post], and i’d never considered it to be an influence until I reflected back upon it. Grumble love is more difficult however, seeing it’s a documentary about pug rescue. Due to the nature of the doco, I can’t notice any influence poking through.
I’ve only been filmmaking for a short time, and this being said I haven’t had time to explore my inspirations and what style I most likely fit in (if any)… I know I am specifically fond of the expressionist films, but if that is the style I will pursue in the future, i’m not sure of. Instead of talking about the examples found in my work, I’m going to talk about the filmmakers that inspire me, and will hopefully help shape my future works.
Lately, very recently in fact, I have been drawing inspiration from Wes Anderson and his use of symmetry in his films. I remember when I first began studying film, we learnt about framing and placing a person in a frame. We were always taught to place an object or person on a third of the frame, as if the centre of the frame isn’t “correct”. I’ve always been unsure about this rule as I never thought there should be a distinct way to film. It should be about expressing feelings and thoughts, not about distinct rules. It may be this rebellion for ‘rules’ as to why I love films that break them. This video of Wes Anderson’s centred frame gives me chills, because to me it looks so beautiful and elegant, and looks like everything I want to accomplish.
Along side Wes Anderson is Tim Burton (who I mentioned in my other blog post). This time, instead of talking about his expressionist qualities (which are my favourite), i’m going to talk about his use of vibrant colours amongst these dark ones. Some examples with colour swatches are shown below:
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory:
Sweeney Todd:
Alice in Wonderland:
Batman:
Beetlejuice:
Edward Scissorhands:
(all images from http://moviesincolor.com/tagged/tim-burton)
Burton is definitely one of my biggest inspirations in filmmaking and has continued to be for years. Not only with Burton having expressionist influences, but his ability to mix the bright with the dark. I haven’t had a chance to play around with contrasting colours as it takes a budget to dress a scene how you really want it, but I love how the darkness brings out the light colours. I remember watching Sweeney Todd for the first time and adoring Mrs. Lovett’s fantasy scene of her and Sweeney Todd falling in love, and the colours in the scene were almost dreamlike juxtaposed to the rest of the film. The use of colour helped tell the story and signified it was a dream like sequence instead of a real time sequence. This is also used in Beetlejuice and Alice in Wonderland. Burtons manipulation of mise en scene inspires me to be a better filmmaker, once I get the opportunity to do so.
These two filmmakers are definitely my top two that I regularly go back to.
One of the directors who, when I get a break of study, want to look into is Gregg Araki, who directed White Bird in a Blizzard, my favourite film. The reason I keep going back to it is because it’s so authentic and real to its nature, and also breaks a few cinematic ‘rules’ we have learnt at uni (again my rebellion side is coming out). One of the main examples I can talk about, is his use of lingering shots to build both tension and to also make the audience feel awkward. The scene below is after the mother/wife in the film goes missing, and the father has fully realised the issue and is staring blankly into space, while the daughter is still indecisive and believes she will return again. The shot lasts for 73 seconds in total and displays minimal movement. Looking back at older Afflictions, I had a minute long frame which could have been influenced by this movie. It isn’t as symbolic as this scene, however it’s unchanging in the same sense.
This one scene in particular is one of my favourites, as the lingering shot makes you feel what the characters are feeling. I want to be able to accomplish this in my films, and I hope to adapt this into my final project as well.
After looking into the filmmakers who inspire me, they all share qualities of breaking ‘rules’ that i’ve been taught so far at uni. From Anderson’s centred frames, Burtons distorted imagery and overly contrasted colours and Araki’s lingering shots, I can see myself latching onto these characteristics for my final project and future films to come. Once i’m out in the real world and making short films, I feel these influences will shine through my work. It’s hard to say for sure what my work will reflect, but these are what my inspirations are and what I love about film, because, well, they make me feel something. Thats what film is all about.
I look forward to the future to when I’m able to express different styles and know for sure, and I can’t wait to show it off to the world. Maybe i’ll even experiment over uni break and post it here! You never know.
Talk again soon,
– D